Talk:Sulfonated phenolics/sulfuric acid

Dentistry Low‑importance

	This article is supported by WikiProject Dentistry. If you want to participate and/or join, please visit the project page, or ask questions on the project talk page.DentistryWikipedia:WikiProject DentistryTemplate:WikiProject Dentistrydentistry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Sulfonated phenolics/sulfuric acid.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

It appears to me the author wrote about a natural healing process from (mouth) ulcurs, in stead of the actual process by which debacterol aids in the healing. Anyone else?

Spam[edit]

This article is a little spammy and has no reliable references. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:02, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Advertising?[edit]

Isn't the phrase "uniquely effective" kind of advertising/weasel word? -ZeniffMartineau (talk) 08:29, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This entire page feels like an ad and has very little critical or neutral language regarding either the compound's ingredients, it's availability outside this company's manufacture nor its analysis. It should be flagged as spammy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.251.57.202 (talk) 00:50, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]