Talk:State capture

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Shannontimmins.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:48, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Definition[edit]

The State Capture definition requires clarification and detail. A more detailed definition has been written as follows:

"'State Capture' is a type of systemic political corruption in which private interests significantly influence a State's decision-making process to their own advantage. The advantage is usually hidden but may be considered legal or lawful, depending on determination by the Captured State itself. The government's capture by non-democratic private interests exists via a range of State institutions; subverted by that private interest/influence. The influence may be manifest in Legislative, Executive, Ministerial, or Judicial branches so captured; or by a corrupt electoral process. 'State Capture' is similar to 'Regulatory Capture' but differs by its wider manifestation, and, unlike Regulatory Capture, State Capture's private influence is not overt and cannot be discovered by lawful processes, since either (or all) the legislative process, judiciary, electoral process and/or executive powers have already been influenced and subverted by the private special interests."

For actual examples, we may consider a group like ALEC (American Legal Exchange Council) or PAC electoral influence, to legislation like Gramm-Leach-Bliley of Sarbanes Oxley, or banks removing important language from Dodd-Frank to strip the bill (as examples) and when time permits I'll have a go. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Montoya44 (talkcontribs) 18:42, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How are corruption and state capture different? Why is state capture not considered a form of corruption? Shannontimmins (talk) 20:22, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Slovakia[edit]

Add Slovakia to the list of offending countries. The events and revelations of 2018-2019 show a remarkable degree of near-complete collapse of respect for the rule of law by ruling politicians and ruling parties, and the large-scale collussion of ruling and powerful politicians with organised crime, dubious oligarchs, corrupt figures in the entire judicial system, and even disinformation spreading conspiracy theory "media". Based on all of the findings, Slovakia has suffered a level of state capture roughly on a level somewhere between Bulgaria and Hungary. This absolutely needs to be documented. Every bit of it. For the future political history of a united Europe, it could prove a major and valuable cautionary tale.

I know we should be bold, but I'd prefer to leave this to an expert on the terminology and this exact field. Thank you, anyone, for considering this proposal.

--ZemplinTemplar (talk) 17:41, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Academic reports[edit]

I have shortened and toned down recent additions relating to academic reports on state capture in South Africa. The preceding edits were by an IP editor and by user Chipkini (possibly one of the authors of the work in question). In particular, I removed additions that I thought were mainly about promoting the work, rather than contributing to the subject matter itself. Paul W (talk) 15:19, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Media capture in Hungary[edit]

I 'm not able to insert this picture as an example of the Uniformised county newspaper frontpages in Hungary (24 December 2019) [1] 193.6.168.20 (talk) 11:58, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It appears to be a copyrighted image (used on this webpage), attributed to 444.hu, so cannot be used on Wikipedia; see Wikipedia:Image use policy. Paul W (talk) 13:18, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ems[edit]

In which tier of government does state capture take place 41.168.110.5 (talk) 15:42, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The date is wrong[edit]

The article says the term "state capture" was first used by the World Bank in 2000. This is not correct -- I read the term while in grad school in sociology in the early 1990s. It was already in use by scholars in political economy and development by then. 2601:CD:C800:C6D0:31CF:E9F8:85BC:F218 (talk) 00:36, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]