A fact from St Michael's Church, Manafon appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 July 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
I suggest that this article by merged with the stub for the village. Any objections? Rwood128 (talk) 00:31, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: IMO the church article should stand alone, in common with other articles on Grade II* listed churches in Wales and elsewhere in the UK; the church is sufficiently notable to have its own article. The article on the village has considerable potential for expansion, so that it can stand alone, too, as an article rather than a stub. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 09:09, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
