This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article was accepted on 12 April 2016 by reviewer MSGJ (talk·contribs).
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Comment: May not meet the mos. 333-blue 07:00, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@333-blue: of course, meeting the WP:MOS is not one of the criteria for creation at AfC, is it? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:33, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Needs to be edited for grammar and tone. I'm not sure whether that needs to be done before approving the article, or if it is better done once it is in mainspace and we can get more people involved. Bradv 16:35, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Bradv: I think you were on the right lines when you were thinking that it could be improved once in mainspace. Perfect grammar or tone is not a criterion for AfC. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:28, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Should this article be moved to something like St. John's rape case (which redirect I've just created)? It seems to me that lacrosse is not really the central issue. The current title may be necessary per WP:COMMONNAME however. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 22:43, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Needs to be edited for grammar and tone. I'm not sure whether that needs to be done before approving the article, or if it is better done once it is in mainspace and we can get more people involved. Bradv 16:35, 9 April 2016 (UTC)