Talk:Spaced learning

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

Education

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Neuroscience

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

I would be grateful for any commments that would improve the page, or relate it to other research.

Is this the same thing is spaced repetition learning? They got a page for that already. Dream Focus (talk) 22:35, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, it isn't. However, the idea of having spaces between learning experiences is, as mentioned in the article, something that has been raised in a number of different contexts. What is different in spaced learning is that it is based on a new neuroscientific discovery about cellular activity in learning (which, in the end, is really a question of DNA)- see Fields's article in Scientific American. This means that the spaces- and number of spaces- is clearly determined by cellular kinetics.

From the two articles, it looks to me that spaced learning has only 2 spaces of exactly 10 minutes, whereas spaced repetition has the gaps starting small and increasing. In spaced repetition, the gaps can be measured in minutes or days - the main thing is they start small and increase. Graduated interval recall is a specific kind of spaced repetition used in Pimsleur language-learning etc and it is mainly done over seconds and minutes (and again the spaces start small and increase). It seems to me that these things are not the same, but are related. I'm not sure if there's an umbrella term that would catch all of them. And if Talk:Spaced repetition is anything to go by, I'm really not sure if the maintainers of the spaced repetition article would appreciate the addition of material that is not strictly to do with spaced repetition but instead is to do with a related technique, so perhaps it's best to keep spaced repetition, spaced learning and graduated interval recall as separate articles that refer to each other. Silas S. Brown (talk) 19:09, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree with the above. The distinction between the two is quite clear in another way: spaced learning is based on the biochemical process of creating long term memory, as demonstated in a range of experiments. Spaced repetition has no basis on a biochemical level. I understand the temptation to link them, but I think there isn't a real link- except the word 'space'. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Monkseatonpaul (talk • contribs) 19:31, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

N There is no consensus for a merger. Colonel Warden (talk) 23:03, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

By Jove!! "spaced learning is based on the biochemical process of creating long term memory" is either forbidden biochemical experiments or sales mumbo-jumbo. Everybody know that our brains are biochemical! Rursus dixit. (^mbork³!) 07:13, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment above[edit]

Will take your advice- thanks for that. Monkseatonpaul (aka Paul)Monkseatonpaul (talk) 08:46, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup needed[edit]

The article needs more headings, more inline citations in the text, and some more about how it differs from simple rehersal methods almost universally used in third world schools. We have known of rehersal in centuries – it is the oldest method. Rursus dixit. (^mbork³!) 07:10, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ebbinghaus[edit]

Someone needs to reference Hermann Ebbinghaus. I'm afraid I just don't have time but Ebbinghaus should receive credit for really being the first to discover/show that spaced and mass training have differential effects on long-term memory (this was ca. 1885) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.61.190.13 (talk) 17:36, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Spaced learning. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:05, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]