Talk:Soviet destroyer Stroyny (1940)

Soviet destroyer Stroyny (1940) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 15, 2019. (Reviewed version).

Military history: Maritime / Russian & Soviet / World War II / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	World War II task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Soviet Union: Military Low‑importance

	Soviet Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Soviet destroyer Stroyny/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 00:57, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this one as well. Parsecboy (talk) 00:57, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Same comments as the other review about Stalin and the displacement
" expended 2,387 130 mm shells" - similar issue to the other one - I believe the MoS advises against a pair of numerals next to each other. You might just say "2,387 main battery shells" or similar
Ditto for the other instances of these

Nice work again. Parsecboy (talk) 14:48, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

- All done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:53, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  - Looks good, happy to promote. Parsecboy (talk) 20:57, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]