Talk:Southern Athabascan grammar

Languages Low‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: New Mexico Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	New Mexico portal This article is supported by WikiProject New Mexico (assessed as Mid-importance).

Indigenous peoples of North America

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled][edit]

Isn't this article somewhat too similar to the grammar section of the Navajo language article? In other words: doesn't the description draw too heavily on a single Southern Athabascan language? Steinbach 14:03, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Please fix it if you have time. – ishwar (speak) 04:06, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious[edit]

Many of these nouns may be quite complex, as in Navajo

chidí naa’na’í bee’eldǫǫhtsoh bikáá’ dah naaznilígíí "army tank" (lit. "a car that they sit up on top of that crawls around :with a big thing with which an explosion is made")

I seriously doubt that this is the actual word for "tank". It looks rather like a description that some speaker gave when describing a tank to someone not expected to know what it is. A "word" like this would be way too long for normal usage.

Benwing (talk) 23:40, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps not for spoken, colloquial usage, where I expect an Anglicism, but in formal, written Navajo, it wouldn't seem that outrageous to me, at least unless the term is mentioned repeatedly in the same text. That said, I don't really have any relevant personal experience with Navajo ... --Florian Blaschke (talk) 16:10, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is doubtful that there is any "formal written" Navajo in any sense comparable to "formal written" English. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.232.80.66 (talk) 19:19, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]