Talk:Sociometric status

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Some Possible Contributions[edit]

Hello! I would like to make some contributions to this page. Here are some of my thoughts: I think more can be said about the ways in which this measure has been used, and the noteworthy/credible pros and cons. There are many peer-reviewed journal articles about this topic, and I notice that other websites have more information than Wikipedia. What do you think? May I make some contributions? Thanks! --Hazjor (talk) 22:56, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New additions to the article[edit]

Hello! I have added several new parts to the article, including descriptions of specific sociometric groups, a section on stability, methodology, and long-term implications. I also edited one sentence written by the previous writer, as I believe they were refering to the wrong source.

I decided not to alter the general structure of the developmental and positive psychology sections, but I suppose that could be done, as the positive psychology section is currently pretty empty. Does anyone have any opinions on that?

Kmmichalczewska (talk) 12:02, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]