Talk:Sir James Mitchell Park

Australia: Western Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Sir James Mitchell Park is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

edits by User:Preserving South Perth open space[edit]

I have reverted these edits by Preserving South Perth open space as they appear to me to be blatant WP:SOAPBOXing. There may be some useful material in there, but:

Relevant material should be included in the body text,
... with references
... and neutrally worded.

@Preserving South Perth open space:, your username suggests a non-neutral opinion on the subject. This doesn't automatically prevent you from editing the article, but there is an obvious risk of a conflict of interest.

If references are available online, please put the links here on the talk page, and we may be able to help add relevant information to the article in a neutral manner. Mitch Ames (talk) 12:56, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

very regularly used location ?[edit]

The term "regularly used location" is a somewhat ambiguous. It could mean that one cyclist uses it every Saturday morning, one runner every Sunday morning, and one dog walker ever Anzac Day. (As someone I know used to say "they are regular church-goers – every Christmas and Easter".) If we mean "frequently used" or "commonly used" or "heavily used", we should say so. If we have some numbers (eg "xxx people per day") even better. A citation for the reference from which we get the information would of course justify the word/numbers. Mitch Ames (talk) 12:31, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]