Talk:Silicon Fen

Business Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

East Anglia Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Map request[edit]

Map needed

It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in England may be able to help!

Note: Cambridge phenomenon redirects to this article. RJFJR (talk) 16:55, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Silicon Fen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:58, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Silicon Fen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120619111115/http://www.isc.hbs.edu/pdf/Student_Projects/2012%20MOC%20Papers/20120504%20MOC%20UK%20Cambridge%20IT%20hardware%20cluster%20-%20Final%20project%20paper.pdf to http://www.isc.hbs.edu/pdf/Student_Projects/2012%20MOC%20Papers/20120504%20MOC%20UK%20Cambridge%20IT%20hardware%20cluster%20-%20Final%20project%20paper.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:10, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How to list relevant companies?[edit]

Listing companies under 'see also' isn't best practice - as reflected in the recent good faith deletion of these links -

What's the best solution? (A separate list article, or a list section?) I'll have a look at some other similar pages . . .

Gilgamesh4 (talk) 09:20, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a new section with the companies and individuals. Any suggestions for different approaches? With regard to the criticism (in a prior edit) that Broadcom shouldn't be included, it is a research facility with 100+ staff, not just 'an office'. Broadcom has made at least two acquisitions in the area, and is pretty active and visible - Why would they not be suitable for inclusion in the list? Gilgamesh4 (talk) 09:16, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]