Talk:Shrutakirti

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Discuss[edit]

Ratan375 said "Shrutakirti is not that important character". IMO, she was a princess, royalty are almost always notable in Wikipedia. Dear, An Indian mythology expert @Redtigerxyz: How do you think? Cape Diamond MM (talk) 14:04, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nope I don't think such short article should be on Wikipedia. There is no enough information about this character. Ratan375 (talk) 14:36, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you but I will happily change my decision to merge if I read Redtigerxyz's comment on this article. However I also love Indian Myth. Cheers Cape Diamond MM (talk) 14:54, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that Shrutakirti is a minor character. Probably should be merged into Shatrughna, with whom the info is mostly overlapping. I checked the Puranic encyclopedia by Mani too. Hardly any info is available. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 13:48, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please kindly add any info to article if you free. Cape Diamond MM (talk) 14:39, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cape Diamond MM, I checked. This is all the info we know about her.--Redtigerxyz ^Talk 12:08, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been expanded by Ratan375, so merger is unnecessary! Thank you so much for your great work Ratan375 ! Cape Diamond MM (talk) 18:12, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from New Page Review process[edit]

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thanks for creating this article. It would be better if you could add page numbers for each cited Google books. Regards..

Gazal world (talk) 18:04, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]