This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject United States HistoryTemplate:WikiProject United States HistoryUnited States History articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
An interesting topic but the draft needs a lot more attention. How about explaining what the panic was? How many people were impacted by the panic? What do we know about what caused it? What stopped it? What factors explain its severity? There should be a lot more citations on this. Cassell04 (talk) 17:14, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You have good references but there is little to no detail in what you contributed. You could expand a lot further into the subject in order to make your additions more substantive. Diving deeper into your citations could provide more information and material to accomplish this. Dominick BattistoneDbattis3 (talk) 01:38, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Good start on the article however it is very brief and not that informative. You seem to have good sources and will be able to add more information to give more insight on the topic of the railroads, you just have not done so yet. Good sources, and good topic, I also like the structure of the article thus far. Add more information, other than that you seem to be on the right track. Great job. NiaSavon (talk) 21:27, 20 October 2018 (UTC)NiaSavon[reply]
