Talk:Seychelles at the 2010 Summer Youth Olympics
 | Seychelles at the 2010 Summer Youth Olympics was a Sports and recreation good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
GA Review[edit]
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Seychelles at the 2010 Summer Youth Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Brad78 (talk) 22:38, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- Although the prose itself is largely well written, the sheer paucity of the details does not meet GA criteria. At the moment the article is little more than a lead sentence and a few brief details about each athlete; it is no more than a series of stub-type articles loosely based on the same subject. The article needs more work to tie the piece together, like a section saying how many athletes, coaches and officials went to the games, how each athlete was selected, perhaps better details on their individual performances. Criteria 1 is definitely the weaker part of this article. At the moment, the article is a disparate section of different details without any main focus. If no more details can be found at this stage, just because an article is a comprehensive as it can be, does not make it a GA. I would class this article at the moment as either stub or start quality only.
To offer some further guidance, avoid linking the bold terms in the lead. Indeed there does not need to be bolds for descriptive titles such as this. The first line is very forced. The lead also contains information not held elsewhere in the article.
- Although the prose itself is largely well written, the sheer paucity of the details does not meet GA criteria. At the moment the article is little more than a lead sentence and a few brief details about each athlete; it is no more than a series of stub-type articles loosely based on the same subject. The article needs more work to tie the piece together, like a section saying how many athletes, coaches and officials went to the games, how each athlete was selected, perhaps better details on their individual performances. Criteria 1 is definitely the weaker part of this article. At the moment, the article is a disparate section of different details without any main focus. If no more details can be found at this stage, just because an article is a comprehensive as it can be, does not make it a GA. I would class this article at the moment as either stub or start quality only.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- At present, everything is sourced.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Perhaps similar to criteria 1, the article does not seem comprehensive. There is no overall focus to the article to bring all the facts together.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Seychelles at the 2010 Summer Youth Olympics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100826005915/http://www.singapore2010.sg:80/public/sg2010/en/en_games/en_games_results.html to http://www.singapore2010.sg/public/sg2010/en/en_games/en_games_results.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:52, 25 February 2016 (UTC)