Talk:Serbia at the Olympics/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Untitled
Redundancy This information is already present at a more appropriate page,Serbia_and_Montenegro_at_the_2004_Summer_Olympics. This page should be reserved for Serbia only, so I will remove most of this information unless anyone objects? Parslad (talk) 19:24, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- No objection from me; I fully agree. There's too much detail for this page, which is intended to be a top-level summary article per the others in this series. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 19:41, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Medals
OK, we have a problem here. Olympic Committee of Serbia was established in 1910, and was also a Yugoslav Olympic Committee. Therefore, all medals of Serbia, SFR Yugoslavia, FR Yugoslavia and Serbia and Montenegro are medals of Serbias OC. That is the reason for those quest for 100th medal on this Olympics. But medals of Serbia are those presented in article already. What do you think? We should at least mention this somehow.. --WhiteWriterspeaks 09:06, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Serbia is the legal successor to Yugoslavia. Yes, we should add information on this in the article, and also mention it in All-time Olympic Games medal table. There is a blogger dispute over the 100th medal (Maksimovic won the 100th medal).--Zoupan 20:07, 5 August 2012 (UTC)Blocked sock:Ajdebre.- Serbia is ONE of the legal successor states to Yugoslavia, not THE successor state. Peacemaker67 (talk) 12:40, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- I think that Zoupan meant that Serbian OC is the legal successor of Yugoslavia OC. That is true... --WhiteWriterspeaks 12:43, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Winter game
Don't you think in winter games appearances should be also written 1924-2006 like for summer games 1920-2004? --Backij (talk) 06:26, 4 October 2012 (UTC)