Talk:Sean Parlaman

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Hardly a “coatrack article” or “content fork”[edit]

The Wikipedia jargon article “Coatrack” plainly defines

A coatrack article is a Wikipedia article that ostensibly discusses the nominal subject, but in reality is a cover for a tangentially related bias subject. The nominal subject is used as an empty coatrack, which ends up being mostly obscured by the "coats".

This article is plainly not about someone or something other than Sean Parlaman. The Wikipedia jargon article “Content fork” defines

A content fork is usually an unintentional creation of several separate articles all treating the same subject.

A simple search of Wikipedia for “Sean Parlaman” would have revealed that, while he is mentioned in a few other articles (which link to this article), there are as yet no alternate articles on the same subject. (Labelling something a possible “content fork” based upon purest conjecture is poor policy; the tag could then be applied to every article on Wikipedia.) —SlamDiego_←T 02:40, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clyde Lewis[edit]

Has Clyde Lewis written this article? It seems so and reads like his sad tabloid-gossip pieces. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.51.138.190 (talk) 02:17, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know, Clyde Lewis had little-or-nothing to do with the writing of this article. And what you're offering here is argument-by-sneer and personal attack on its editors. —SlamDiego_←T 03:39, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your conjecture that I am Clyde Lewis ([1][2]) isn't an improvement on the above argument-by-sneer. —SlamDiego_←T 22:52, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]