This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
The scotch boiler is not exclusively a marine type. Many stationary boilers, particularly mid-sized package boilers, have been scotch type. I suggest this article title should be just Scotch boiler (which currently redirects here). Globbet (talk) 22:25, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Few things are absolutely black and white - but the name in that form is widely used (check the refs), the text of the article already covers this in the first sentence and the type was vastly more common on ships than it was on land. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:57, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This one uses "scotch boiler": Griffiths, Denis, FIMarE (1997). Steam at Sea: two centuries of steam-powered ships. London: Conway Maririme Press. ISBN0851776663.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)Globbet (talk) 23:56, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't want to get involved in the discussion, but both the article name and the redirect can (and should) be mentioned at the start -- so I've been bold and done just that. EdJogg (talk) 11:10, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
