Talk:Scientific controversy

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophy of science

Science High‑importance

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Notability[edit]

Why would this page redirect to Scientific method? Do people think that science has not had its share of controversies in modern times? I could draw up a lengthy list of scientific controversies, just from the last 400 years (since Galileo). --Uncle Ed (talk) 20:51, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Call to arms[edit]

It would be nice to have an article rather than just a list of quotes. Vsmith (talk) 16:41, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article Evaluation[edit]

Everything in the article is related to the topic except the last section, "Government involvement".Not sure what's the relationship with the topic.

One citation link with "Nation Center for Science Education"cannot be found. Most of them are neutral resources, from university, scientific magazine, dictionary. The last one cited from UKessays might be biased because it is a writing website with unknown author.

The article is part of the WikiProject Science and has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale and as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Davidyang94 (talk) 00:03, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Article Content[edit]

Proposal to add a section for Covid-19 origin controversy.

Examples of scientific controversies[edit]

The very last sentence says, "Listed below, there are some of the various examples of scientific controversies." But there's none. This has to be rectified. — Python Drink (talk) 18:47, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Content doesn't reflect lead[edit]

This article's content does not reflect the given definition for "scientific controversy", which (according to given and sourced definition) is a neutral term describing scholarly disagreement--with that disagreement not having to arise from bias. JackTheSecond (talk) 14:24, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]