Talk:Science of underwater diving

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

B-class assessmant[edit]

B
  1. The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations.
    It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web}} is optional.
    Nothing remotely controversial, but could use a ref or two for the physics section. NOAA manual should be adequate.
  2. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies.
    It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.
    checkY Fairly sure most if not necessarily all aspects covered in appropriate detail.
  3. The article has a defined structure.
    Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.
    checkY Complies
  4. The article is reasonably well-written.
    The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it does not need to be "brilliant". The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously.
    checkY Looks OK to me
  5. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate.
    Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.
    checkY Has no illustrations, graphics or infoboxes, but I can't think of any that would be particularly useful, so going to pass it on this.
  6. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way.
    It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. Although Wikipedia is more than just a general encyclopedia, the article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.
    checkY Loos OK to me.


Pretty close. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 17:44, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]