Talk:Schiffli embroidery machine

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 2 February 2019 by reviewer Theroadislong (talk · contribs).

Possible sources[edit]

https://www.textileschool.com/128/schiffli-machine-embroidery/ Theroadislong (talk) 16:30, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Felkin, William (1867). A History of the Machine-wrought Hosiery and Lace Manufactures. Longmans, Green, and Company. This is available on Google Books and might have some ability as a reference on some claims. Desertborn (talk) 16:35, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Goldenberg, Samuel L. (1904). Lace, its origin and history. Brentano's. This is available on Google Books. Looks like pages 20, 77, and 56 are useful sources for this article. Desertborn (talk) 16:39, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Kettle, Alice; McKeating, Jane (2010). Machine Stitch: Perspectives. A&C Black. ISBN 9780713688689. This is available on Google Books. Looks like pages 149, 206, and 151 are useful sources for this article. Desertborn (talk) 16:46, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Robertson, Andrea (1 February 2005). "FROM ECONOMY TO EXCLUSIVITY: A HISTORY OF THE DEVORE TEXTILE 1880 TO 1940". Buckinghamshire New University. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help) Has potential with eight references to Schiffli. Desertborn (talk) 16:46, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Tanner, Albert (19 July 2013). "The Cotton Industry of Eastern Switzerland, 1750–1914: From Proto-Industry to Factory and Cottage Industry". Textile History. 23 (2): 139–164. doi:10.1179/004049692793712304. This is behind a paywall so someone with subscription access would need to read it. But adding here as a potential just in case. (Note to editors: Feel free to remove if you think this isn't useful). Desertborn (talk) 16:46, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]