Talk:Saxa (food product)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Will someone please explain why Saxa is unencylopedic? I'm not saying whether it is or isn't, however no reason has been given as to why it is unencylopedic. Salinae 23:12, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't work that way. We need to find references establishing that the subject of the article is encyclopedic according to the WP:N and WP:V guidelines. If you feel that the subject meets those criteria, then remove the deletion notice from the article. —Psychonaut 23:33, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the deletion notice since in my opinion Saxa salt satisifes WP:N since: it is the subject of a Hornby railway carriage; it's livery is used on a full size wagon; and it's mentioned in A short history of British Television Advertising by the National Media Museum. Note that although the Hornby wagon and the real wagon carry SAXA advertising, they are not produced by RHM so they are independent.Salinae 22:06, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

response to photo suggestion tag[edit]

Generally images perk wiki pages up, but in this case with so little text wouldn't the article read as an advertisement? - Steve3849 ^talk 14:10, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]