Talk:Sanibel, Florida

Florida Low‑importance

	Florida portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Untitled[edit]

FYI: Robert Rauschenberg lived on Captiva, not Sanibel. I have deleted his name from notable residents. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mistershirt (talk • contribs) 21:56, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Merger[edit]

Since the entire island is incorporated into the city of Sanibel, I'm proposing the merger of Sanibel Island into this article. Niteshift36 (talk) 03:31, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I support a merge as well. I've lived on Sanibel my entire life. There is no part of Sanibel that isn't Sanibel Island and vice versa. Any pre-incorporation should be included under History.38.149.170.48 (talk) 21:37, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would leave them unmerged but I'd include (under Sanibel, Florida) the parts about the actual municipality since it was incorporated in 1974. This would consist of things like History since 1974, Demographics, Education and Notable Residents. Anything that would happen whether the current city existed or not (like: History before 1974, Ecology, Beaches and Climate), I'd put in Sanibel Island.

For example, I'd include part of the subsection Hurricanes in both articles. The Sanibel Island article would stop with "Blind Pass was again cut through, but refilled less than one month later". Sanibel, Florida would start with something like "In August 2004, Hurricane Charley passed directly over Captiva Island, just north of Sanibel. The City put together reentry packets..." and so forth.

I'd certainly add hatnotes, referencing Sanibel, Florida from Sanibel Island and vice versa. See Template:about for more details. Hope this helps. --RoyGoldsmith (talk) 16:44, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The city of Sanibel covers the entire island. There is no Sanibel Island that isn't in the city of Sanibel. Anything pre-incorporation could easily be merged. Many articles about cities cover the history before they were established as cities. Niteshift36 (talk) 20:45, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support merge. They cover the exact same thing. Reywas92^Talk 02:57, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It does not make sense to leave them seperate, the island is too small to warrant two wikipedia articles. I would merge them both under Sanibel Island, Florida and create a section for the municipality. Many of the current sections are just repeats. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nolongersmith (talk • contribs) 18:32, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge – I feel that the two should be separate articles, but with the amount of information that we have, it would work better as one article. ^Pepper∙_piggle 22:37, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. The two topics can be successfully differentiated in a single article, IMO. --Bradeos Graphon Βραδέως Γράφων (talk) 05:43, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Two different topics. The notability that the island itself has is not the same notability that the town has. The island's article is pretty well developed in terms of content, but it has a small amount of content that should be in the town's article alone. The town's article does not really have any information that should only be located in the island's article. Contrary to Nolongersmith, both topics certainly warrant their own article. Swarm^Talk 18:52, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The content overlaps significantly now, but there is a whole history of the island prior to incorporation that will be exclusively in the island article Scaptivate (talk) 16:44, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Sanibel is the incorporated town. Sanibel Island is the land with much history. Because it is so notable, it should be kept as two different pages. jswfl09 (talk) 9:26, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

I honestly think the oppose votes are missing the point. Nobody is denying the history of the island prior to incoporation. However, there is no reason why it need to be separate. Almost every city had a history prior to it becoming a city and that history is incorporated into a single article in the vast majority of the cases. Take the county seat of Lee County (where Sanibel is located), Ft. Myers. The history in the article goes back to before the city existed. There was no need to make a pre-incorporation and post incorporation article. All of Sanibel is Sanibel Island. That means all of Sanibel Island's history is Sanibel's history. Niteshift36 (talk) 23:30, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This has been left alone for a good while. 6 support merger and 4 oppose it. I would like to hear from any that oppose it and have them explain how the history of the island would somehow vaporize if the two were merged. Niteshift36 (talk) 23:10, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge According to the Sanibel city (yes, Sanibel is a city)[1] charter, the corporate limits are co-terminus with the island. [2]. Compare Longboat Key, Florida. The articles need to be merged and rewritten to bring up to Wikipedia standards. clariosophic (talk) 17:22, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support merge: Sanibel is the US Postal Service designation, not Sanibel Island. The article on Sanibel Island should be added to the article on Sanibel as history prior to incorporation. The fact that there are currently two separate articles caused only confusion when I was looking for information. The confusion is unnecessary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bigbells (talk • contribs) 15:11, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Sanibel, Florida. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:52, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]