Talk:Sacramento Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Water

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Water, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Water supply-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WaterWikipedia:WikiProject WaterTemplate:WikiProject WaterWater articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

California

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in California may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Untitled[edit]

Lucy's Peer Review

1. The lead section is easy to understand, has clear structure, balanced coverage, and neutral content. Add more/reliable sources to improve credibility (although you probably know this).

2. Your lead section describes importance of topic but should be gone into detail a little bit more. I would add more background information such as it's history and current and future projects.

3. Your page has a clear structure as is well organized. I would recommend to find ways to ease transition between your talking points (SRWTP, EchoWater Project, Biosolids Management, etc.)

4. I recommend going into more detail in your lead section (SRWTP) so that its importance is established. Also, detail to the other topics would be good as well, such as: How exactly will SRWTP achieve the goals set by EchoWater Project? What is the SRWTP installing/changing to meet the standards by 2021? How are they doing it so quick? What drives them doing it so quick?

5. Article is unbiased with neutral content.

6. I would connect more statements to reliable sources and add links in your page to other Wiki pages so that people can go look to see a definition of something if they don't understand it, such as defining the EchoWater Project.

7. This article is structured clearly and the content is well written.

8. To improve the article, I would focus on the smaller detail but make sure everything makes sense and is covered broadly.

Cool Article!

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Aspease.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:11, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 January 2020 and 22 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): EEdnacot. Peer reviewers: CristianBaltazar.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:11, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]