Talk:Rutherford model

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by History Taskforce.

History of Science Mid‑importance

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

1

Archive 1 created[edit]

Please see this page for more talk articles. Anarchyte (talk) 08:20, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External Links are dead 404[edit]

Both externals lead to the university website where the article is not found — Preceding unsigned comment added by Planex1832 (talk • contribs) 00:36, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete?[edit]

After reading this article twice, I find that it does not belong in the Category of "Obsolete scientific theories," and therefore I have removed the category from this article.--71.36.99.75 (talk) 22:59, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this? The theory is no longer used, and the current atomic model is the cloud model. I think that this qualifies as obsolete, unless there is some other category for no-longer used scientific theories. 50.90.74.156 (talk) 01:32, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

why alpha particles are not deflected by electrons Kanchan Kothari (talk) 17:04, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Theoretically, they could be, but the charge is so spread out and the electron mass so much smaller that any effects from the electron cloud are basically negligible. 166.181.82.127 (talk) 06:02, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Rutherford model. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:32, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blunder[edit]

What is the blunder of Rutherford's atomic nature Max Yusuf (talk) 04:54, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Chemistry[edit]

Niel Bohr model of atom 197.215.27.63 (talk) 20:40, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@197.215.27.63 why alpha particle was not difflected by electrons? Kanchan Kothari (talk) 17:01, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]