Talk:Rubus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Is there a species called Rubus coreanus? Badagnani (talk) 22:57, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Added. Badagnani (talk) 07:58, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 01:49, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Book[edit]

This book contains some useful information that could be used to improve the article. MP (talkcontribs) 21:05, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merging "Bramble" with this page[edit]

The word bramble is used as a synonym for either blackberries specifically, or for Rubus more generally. Either way, there is no point in having a separate article called "Bramble", so I propose that the useful parts of its content be merged into this page. Gabbe (talk) 15:31, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Gabbe: Agreed. The information presented here does not warrant a separate article. Go for it! Lepidoptera (talk) 13:45, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Reviving this discussion, because as far as I can tell, the term "bramble" is basically synonymous with Rubus. Hemiauchenia (talk) 22:17, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, I think they should be merged. Averixus (talk) 06:25, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I also agree. I note the claim in Bramble that "Bramble" is also used to describe other prickly shrubs, such as roses (Rosa species), which might justify a separate article, is supposedly supported by a reference that actually says any prickly shrub belonging to the genus Rubus, of the rose family. Peter coxhead (talk) 06:57, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Peter coxhead: @Averixus: I've redirected bramble and merged some of its content into this article. I ommitted a lot of it as I thought it was either unencyclopedic (like a weeding guide), or uncited. Do you think there's any other content worth merging. Hemiauchenia (talk) 20:02, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Hemiauchenia: there's some stuff about ecology that ought to be in a Rubus article, but as you note it's not fully cited. Ditto uses. So I agree with your merges. Peter coxhead (talk) 18:48, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Massive revision of Rubus taxonomy[edit]

"Target Capture Sequencing Unravels Rubus Evolution" Dec 2019 Open access. One of the biggest updates to Rubus taxonomy in decades, several subgenera found to be polyphyletic, anybody interested in updating the article? Hemiauchenia (talk) 14:32, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]