Talk:Royal Albert Dock, Liverpool

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleRoyal Albert Dock, Liverpool has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 3, 2009Good article nomineeListed

Albert Dock at Night[edit]

That picture 'Albert Dock at Night'... isn't that actually looking over the SALTHOUSE dock? :p 81.31.97.129 (talk) 17:53, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. Thumbnail label has been clarified. Snowy 1973 (talk) 10:45, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stacks vs Pavillions[edit]

I note that the article refers to 'Pavillion (formally xxx stack)'. Does this mean the formal name of the pavillion is xxx stack - or that it used to be xxx stack, with 'formally' being a mistake for 'formerly'? To my mind, 'formerly' is probably the word intended. If I don't get any argument ot proof to the contrary, I'll change it in a week or two. Peridon (talk) 19:00, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Beatles Story[edit]

Hello thats not right.

Two years later in 1990 The Beatles Story museum opened, the only Beatles themed visitor attraction in the world, providing yet another draw to the Albert Dock

Have a look [1] and de:Beatles-Museum Halle. Regards --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎ 14:16, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good point - I changed it to "in Britain". --David Edgar (talk) 15:04, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Albert Dock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:16, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Page title update[edit]

The title of the page needs to be changed from The Royal Albert Dock Liverpool to Royal Albert Dock Liverpool.

Is there any reason why other than just branding? Dormskirk (talk) 17:19, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'd also question whether Royal Albert Dock should go to the London dock (which is later), or to the set index page Albert Dock (disambiguation). Andy Dingley (talk) 08:35, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of Atlantic slave trade?[edit]

Just curious here: there's no mention of the Atlantic Slave Trade despite the Merseyside Maritime Museum being host to the International Slavery Museum, and the dry docks being located directly adjacent to (then not Royal but now) Royal Albert Dock, with the warehousing on the dock itself storing products yielded by the kidnapping and sale of Africans, with the main prewar economic boom of the city owing almost everything to the slave trade itself. It seems a little wild that it's not mentioned at all — I'm happy to include it based on secondary sources written by the museum itself as well as other sources, but I'm trying to build consensus first because of the rating of this article. Anyone care to chime in? ɯɐɔ 💬 08:11, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm certainly no expert on the subject, but having had a quick read up, the Slavery Abolishion Act was 1833 and the dock opened in 1846. I'm sure all slavery didn't end exactly in 1833 and money earned from the slavery probably funded part of the docks, but I can't see anything in the article, or about Jesse Hartley, that says how the dock's construction was funded. That aside, it does seem unusual there is little reference of slavery when the association with Liverpool is so strong. Did you have an idea what you were going to write about the links? LicenceToCrenellate (talk) 08:50, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]