Talk:Roseville train collision

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 21 October 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) BegbertBiggs (talk) 12:52, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Roseville (NSW) collision (1950)Roseville train collision – The current title contains unnecessary disambiguation by adding the place and year when this seems to be the only notable Roseville collision. Additionally, NSW is an unexplained acronym. I don't really mind if this page is moved to some other similar title, seeing as there seems to be no consistency in railway accident naming in Category:Railway accidents and incidents in New South Wales/ Steelkamp (talk) 09:44, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support: Agree with the strange unnecessary disambiguation. I would have boldly just done the move to be honest. Fork99 (talk) 07:40, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. Thryduulf (talk) 09:59, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:05, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.