Talk:Robert Hecht-Nielsen

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

I have this guy for a class. His lectures are interesting, albeit tangential at times.

I've seen a talk by him. I'm surprised there's no section on criticism of his ideas. From what I saw, he has made rather grandiose claims for a program that just randomly finishes the ends of sentences. That seems like a far cry from goal-directed behavior. It's possible that few people have taken him serious enough to publish criticisms though. Of course, I haven't actually looked for any. 128.197.81.47 16:26, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've taken a couple classes with him (about 5 years ago) and I've also been to some of his talks. In his class we implemented some of his developments, which proved to be quite powerful and promising. I have no doubt that his ideas will be used to create powerful real-world applications in years to come. However, if I had judged his ideas based on his talks alone I would not have taken him very seriously. This is because he has a lot of confidence in his ideas, often making grandiose claims, without feeling the need to take the time necessary to fully convince the audience. I would not recommend judging his ideas based on his talks alone. At the very least, I recommend taking a wait and see attitude. His own words sum up his attitude pretty well: (from [1])

“Of course it’s preposterous for anyone in 2007 to make these claims, but, as Dizzy Dean once said, ‘It ain’t bragging if you can do it.’”

I too have been to a couple of talks of his, and some of his grandiose claims were startling in their naivete... he asserted that as self-assembly and various mechanical engineering advanced along with his intelligent neural networks, there would no longer be an economy, as everybody's desires would be fully satisfied by their friendly robot servants. While I surely don't doubt that one day there will be practically zero humans left in manufacturing or agriculture, it seems obvious there will always be scarcity of some resources in the world. Still, he's an incredibly intelligent guy, and I felt lucky to have run across him as he is outside my field.128.54.70.85 (talk) 17:07, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--192.91.171.36 18:02, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]