This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
Hi Malymac: Reading over this page, it looks like some of the assertions you've added recently (diff: [1]) express opinions that are not neutral about the subject, and don't cite sources (e.g. "He even used one introduction, that to 'Themistius on Physics 4', to attack a deceased dedicatee and promote the work of one of his own students", "often stronger in anecdote than analysis"). I don't want to get involved in editing the page directly, as I have collaborated with Prof. Sorabji on an academic project in the past, and I feel that I have a personal conflict of interest here. But could I draw your attention to Wikipedia policies on Neutral Point of View and Biographies of Living persons, and encourage you to cite sources for these assertions and revise them to write from a neutral point of view? Note in particular from WP:NPOV that "Editing from a neutral point of view (NPOV) means representing fairly, proportionately, and as far as possible without bias, all significant views that have been published by reliable sources", and from the Wikipedia policy on biographies of living persons that "All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source using an inline citation. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion." Thanks in advance. Olympiodorus (talk) 21:31, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks for the quick response (here: [2]), Malymac – I'm removing the NPOV flag I added to the main page. Olympiodorus (talk) 22:16, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I think I need to re-voice my neutrality concern here. Recent changes since previous comments (see diff: [3]) contain assertions about S.'s work that are either editorializing, unsourced, or appear to imply original research ("woefully inadequate" editions, for example, without citation of a source (has this view been expressed in the critical literature?), and "cavalier attitude to ancient history", which seems like editorializing.) I'd like to encourage Malymac, in continuing work on the article, to avoid commentary without verifiable sources and editorial remarks, and I'd encourage M. also to consider that Wikipedia is not a place for original research. Olympiodorus (talk) 04:50, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
