Talk:Reverse chronology

Literature Mid‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles

Examples of Use[edit]

Isn't Blogging essentially all reverse chronology? It opens up to far more examples than there are for the other media, but it seems like something worth noting. (96.255.198.30 (talk) 05:57, 26 February 2014 (UTC))[reply]

Regarding the revision from 09:57, 27 January 2009 220.236.144.32 - I'm not sure Coldplay's video fits this description, as it does not have just the scenes in a reverse chronological order, but the entire video is reversed. - 193.43.244.93 (talk) 13:56, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It fits this article's description. Reversing the video is the same as reversing the order of the video is the same as reversing the chronology of the video.

@Escape Orbit, You deleted my last edit. How is a lipdub with 1+ Million views not a "notable" example of use? It is. Furthermore, it's an example of use. Justify your deletion. Richardc020 (talk) 18:52, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Synthesis[edit]

As far as I'm aware, listing examples of instances of reverse chronology where those examples are not referred to in a reliable source as being such an example (or an equivalent term) would be WP:SYNTHESIS which means they should be sourced appropriately or removed. Thoughts? VernoWhitney (talk) 18:58, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You might consider The October List by Jeffery Deaver as another (excellent) example of the RC in the literature (thriller). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:66:8A7A:6315:1930:340A:770:FEAC (talk) 11:30, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]