Talk:Reinhard Scheer

Reinhard Scheer has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 3, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed
June 18, 2010	WikiProject peer review	Reviewed

Current status: Good article

Germany Mid‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Biography / Maritime / European / German / World War I / Operation Majestic Titan

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War I task force
	Operation Majestic Titan (Phase IV)

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Reinhard Scheer/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

On first reading, before I get to the formal evaluation, this looks like an excellent article that I will have no trouble approving. There is only one oversight that should be corrected: Several citations refer to "Tarrant," but it is not identified in the bibliography. Reviewer: PKKloeppel (talk) 22:01, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for catching that, I added the full reference to the bibliography. Parsecboy (talk) 02:49, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Formal evaluation: The article is

1. Well-written:

(a) the prose is clear and the spelling and grammar are correct: yes

(b) it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections and layout: yes

2. Factually accurate and verifiable:

(a) it provides references to all sources of information: yes

(b) it provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations: yes

(c) it contains no original research: yes

3. Broad in its coverage:

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic: yes

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail: yes

4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias: yes

5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute: yes

6. Illustrated, if possible, by images:

(a) images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: yes

(b) images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: yes

Summary: The article meets all the criteria for a Wikipedia Good Article. Passed. PKKloeppel (talk) 14:27, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]