Talk:Red shirt (photography)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject History of photography.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Not sure about pioneer photographers. Does anyone have the NGS book ? Pradiptaray 00:20, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I get 13 Google hits for this term. Outside of an NG reference, who actually uses this term? --Calton | Talk 00:28, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I will get back to you after looking at the book literature I cited. Even if only NG parlance, it seems notable enough to have a chapter dedicated to it in the Centenary Compilation of the Society. This parlance is in use among photographers, I have a few friends who independently use it (though that is definitely not a notability criterion). But I feel that a mere lack of Google hits is not sufficient to brand it not noteworthy. Pradiptaray 00:47, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the hits are on blogs, and Flickr annotations from independent photographers, so the term has some circulation. Pradiptaray 01:04, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The term also has possibly negative connotations. Pradiptaray 01:00, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the hits are on blogs, and Flickr annotations

Not reliable sources and not reliable sources, respectively. Again, where do scholars, media sources, books of professional photography or other actual reliable sources use this? This is more and more looking like either original research or a regurgitation of NG's usage. --Calton | Talk 09:10, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is NG usage, thats the point. But I have cited at least 2 works published outside the NG community which use the term. There are at least 4 or 5 independent (non Geographic) sources which might be cited, quite a few are about the cultural impact / photographic trend impact of Geographic . And as I said, the technique is notable enough to warrant a chapter in the centenary publication of the society - the book here. A 20 page article on the matter at hand. Pradiptaray 17:03, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I will remove the non-notability tag if there are no further objections on Jan 1. ray 07:26, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Am doing so ray 15:30, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Schindlers list red dress.JPG[edit]

The image Image:Schindlers list red dress.JPG is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:15, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]