Talk:Red Rose Speedway/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
why is this source reliable?
note 13^ "Top Pop Albums of 1973". Retrieved 11 January 2011. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.218.9.50 (talk) 05:12, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
How can this article receive a C on the project's quality scale?
I'm very suspicious about the C-rating for this album article − none of the points made in the main text are supported by specific references; there is no discussion on the album's critical reception (and they had plenty to say in 1973 − it was reviled); Rolling Stone's rating is said to be 'favourable', when 'polite' would be closer to the mark surely (compare with RS's 'favourable' review for Harrison's Living in the Material World). So, claims are not supported by verifiable sources, the article is not structured into accessible sections, and the lack of a section detailing critical assessment makes the overall piece incomplete. Those issues warrant a 'start' rating, no? JG66 (talk) 06:24, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- I'll change it to Start. Thanks for spotting the flaws. yeepsi (Time for a chat?) 13:29, 11 April 2012 (UTC)