Talk:Reading Abbey

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Priory vs. Abbey[edit]

The text says that the abbey was founded by Henry I, and established by a party of monks from Cluny. My understanding is that many abbeys were created on the Cluniac model and were controlled by the abbot of Cluny, and that these abbeys were technically called "Priory" rather than "Abbey". What was the status of Reading Abbey re Cluny? Did the abbot of Reading report directly to the abbot of Cluny? And if it was an abbey subservient to Cluny, should it have been technically called a Priory (obviously I do not question what it was actually called)? Or was this a special case?

Not sure if there is a place for this in the text, more a matter of curiosity. Revcasy (talk) 12:56, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Burial of Henry I, 1136 by Harry Morley, painted in 1916.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Burial of Henry I, 1136 by Harry Morley, painted in 1916.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:59, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 17:10, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Reading Abbey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:20, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

£3m? £8m? completed & reopened?[edit]

Clarification seems needed. There's mention of a £3m project, then (with a BBC citation) of £8m, then a go-ahead based on match-funding - and the figures provided, detailing the match funding, add up to the earlier £3m figure. And there's a June 2018 reopening with everything seemingly finished. So what's happening / happened about the other £5m? (Why was it thought to be needed??) - SquisherDa (talk) 05:32, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Abbey Mill, Reading in to Reading Abbey[edit]

I propose merging Abbey Mill, Reading in to Reading Abbey. The Abbey Mill article duplicates the section on the abbey mill in this article. I cannot find any significant coverage of the mill after the closure of the abbey so I think its best to merge it back here. Tim Landy (talk) 09:17, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]