Talk:Radical chic/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Reasons and Resonance

This doesn't really explain the genesis or exodus of the term. "Radical" is an English word meaning getting to the roots; "chic" is a French word meaning fashionable. It seems a rather random collision of words, and I don't understand why it has survived for decades. "Bourgeois bohemian", for example, is alliterative and oxymoronic. "Radical chic", however, is neither euphonic nor semantically interesting. Why???--Jack Upland (talk) 11:13, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Radical chic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:22, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Che Chic

Most of the information in the Che Chic section is irrelevant.--Jack Upland (talk) 08:48, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

It also has too many subsections and too many notes. I will tidy this up.--Jack Upland (talk) 18:02, 2 January 2019 (UTC)