Talk:Quetiapine

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Exclusivity status of Seroquel XR.[edit]

Maybe some research about the exclusivity status of Seroquel XR should be done. The "Dosage" section mentions 2017 as the year of expiration of such exclusivity. However, I just got my refill for 150mg tablets, and got a Generic made by Teva, and named Teva Quetiapine XR.

Update: Here are some links about the subject. It seems that AstraZeneca's patent on the XR formula was challenged, and the challenge was upheld in court.

http://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/knowledge/publications/77262/pharma-in-brief-canada-federal-court-dismisses-prohibition-application-for-quetiapine-tablets [dead link] (archived March 3, 2016)

http://www.pharmatimes.com/news/teva_fast_out_of_the_blocks_to_sell_generic_seroquel_975507

These links were found with Google using this search expression: "Teva Pharmaceuticals Quetiapine"

Codeine[edit]

Is this in the compounding of this medicine? 174.218.214.115 (talk) 15:41, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quetiapine and Anxiety[edit]

Hi everyone. I've been taking Quetiapine for a long time, and can definitely say it has a good effect on Anxiety. It helps you relax and feel better, and its a great medication. I've been searching for good sources for that, although its already stated in the article itself it can be used for anxiety, I believe. But let me say this. Qutiapine definitely helps with all 3 major problems, which are Depression, Anxiety and Schizophernia. The only problem is it makes you very sleepy. I've been taking the lowest dose, 25 mg, so I can be able to focus on work and studies, and so on. This is an amazing medication which had changed my life. I was born with Asperger syndrome, and I cant believe how much this medication had helped me. Noam111g (talk) 03:13, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Articles' talk pages are not a forum: Article talk pages exist solely to discuss how to improve articles; they are not for general discussion about the subject of the article. As you say, the article already mentions what you're saying your personal experience has been. Kimen8 (talk) 11:51, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I second this, this is simply a page for a drug, what it does and how it functions, this is not a forum, thanks for reminding this user. Databoose43 (talk) 17:42, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with one of the papers referenced in regards to quetiapine's antihistamanergic activitiy.[edit]

Hello, i was reading one of the papers in reference to the receptor binding affinity table on the wiki page and its binding affinities/actions on the respective receptors.

One of the reference papers, which was not paywaled (which i may add was quite high quality), clearly did state that it believes to be an antagonist, and not just an inverse agonist, with the statement "Quetiapine is a histamine H1 receptor antagonist", now this does not prove it is (although i strongly believe it is), but considering the quality of this paper i am more learning towards being convinced of this claim.

This is all fine and dandy, and to be clear, i am still genuinely convinced quetiapine is a full H1 antagonist, however the paper i take issue with , mentions within the abstract, that the histamine 1 receptor blockade is as a result of Clozapine, and while somewhat similar drugs, are not the same as quetiapine, now in the full paper, it goes on to test Astemizole for histamine blockade, which is a completely different drug from quetaipine, and at no point in the full paper is quetiapine even mentioned in regards to the H1 receptor or antihistamangerigc activity at all

I think this particular reference should be removed, but i encourage other users to chime in on this please. Databoose43 (talk) 18:05, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]