Talk:Queen of Cups

Untitled

This should better relate to other articles, tarot, queen of hearts, etc. Mathiastck 19:52, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

NPOV

Parsa and myself have been have been placing the NPOV tags on the cards. See the talk page at Talk:The World (Tarot card) Since tarot cards were not designed for the occult, the placement of "occult" stub tags does constitute POV and ignores tarot's gaming heritage. These individual card pages offer nothing more than occult speculations and perhaps should be deletedSmiloid 00:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Cup / chalice / religion

I want this to be added to the article: "The cup, a chalice, that she's holding seems more to be a religion not a cup."

Cup is water element. Consciousness is water that is in a cup. Love consciousness. This is not original research. You pour water from the cup. You pour consciousness.WillBildUnion (talk) 20:18, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

No, that is original research until you cite a reliable source. What you provided just now is nothing but your own interpretation, and Wikipedia does not accept the personal interpretation of any editor. Ian.thomson (talk) 21:03, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Well I could get a source but this article is not important to me. While it seems it has become important for you to stalk my edits, and seems, to revert my edits if it does not go with your knowledge or opinion. Half of wikipedia would be deleted if every sentence in wikipedia would be demanded to be sourced. What I wrote is not my own interpretation. You just want to be hard for me.WillBildUnion (talk) 21:10, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Properly citing sources is an important aspect of Wikipedia. As is assuming good faith. Holding every editor I come across to the guidelines is nothing personal against you. You are the one that has avoided citing your sources. Ian.thomson (talk) 21:56, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Merge to

I am suggesting that the information on the individual card pages for the cups suit would be better placed in Suit of cups pageTetron76 (talk) 17:11, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Queen of Cups. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070927225647/http://www.innertraditions.com/Product.jmdx?action=displayDetail&id=887&searchString=huson&y=7&x=7 to http://www.innertraditions.com/Product.jmdx?action=displayDetail&id=887&searchString=huson&y=7&x=7

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:16, 16 July 2016 (UTC)