Talk:Queen's English Society

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Linguistics Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disassociation of the name[edit]

Should a note be added to ensure the reader is aware that the society is in no way, shape or form endorsed by the Queen? Given the posessive apostrophe etc..129.67.17.20 (talk) 22:52, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Making this less QES-POV[edit]

We need to add in some information on the many criticisms that the QES has received from prominent authors and reduce the parts that express the opinions of the QES. As the head note says, as the moment the article looks like it was written on behalf of the society. I don't have time do anything now, but anyone fancies it here's one of many critics to consider quoting. sorsoup (talk) 00:38, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Criticisms Deleted[edit]

I see that Mestinel has deleted all criticism of the QES from this article. I'm planning to add it back in, as I think the article currently gives undue weight to the views of members of the society. sorsoup (talk) 01:31, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Queen's English Society. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120721233925/http://www.queens-english-society.com/events.html to http://www.queens-english-society.com/events.html
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.queens-english-society.org.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:39, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Regrettably, neither link takes you anywhere useful. The society's domain seems to have expired and the Charity Commission's website seems to be undergoing a redesign. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.54.207.205 (talk) 12:54, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]