Talk:Qanungoh Shaikh

Recent Edits.

The purpose of this article is to present reference-able facts and is not a venue for personal theories and caprices. Please do not edit this article with a view to self-aggrandize or promote non-verifiable theories. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Potohar1982 (talk • contribs) 22:42, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

I have added new, referenced materials and photographs, which are currently subject to Wikipedia copyright ascertainment and may be removed. That said these materials are subject to Wikipedia's fair use requirements as they are not for commercial use and the subjects in question are deceased. I am also in the process of obtaining permissions from the copyright holders' (if any). I have also cleaned up this article and removed unnecessary, unverifiable and superfluous content. Please do not edit without verifiable references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Potohar1982 (talk • contribs) 02:51, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Recent Edits.

I have reverted a few recent edits which have no basis other than personal aggrandizement. Please do not add information which cannot be referenced.

Vandalism.

I have removed vandalism/unsubstantiated information. Please do not edit and add fanciful theories without providing references. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Potohar1982 (talk • contribs) 21:30, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Answer (vandalism/unsubstantiated): Kindly do not make Wikipedia as your own personalpedia, as far as i know i am from last 9 generations Qanungoh, and i did research while studying in London and also Met Old Qanungoh's, such as Himayun's Family those were founder's of Qanungoh Magazine in Pakistan, Met Kanungo from India side, I met also Clan Lamont People and Lagmann people from Sweden, so please do not remove just being Baised, Wikipedia is Open to all and this is how you correct history and please dont make History what you like to be there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.26.194.142 (talk) 10:48, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

As you cannot provide references for these theories which are clearly rubbish by any standard, I am putting this to Wikipedia dispute resolution, which shall potentially lock the article.

I am currently resident in the UK and have access to most academic resources various universities have to offer. If you indeed have any research substantiating your theories as you claim, you're free to edit the article provided you furnish you claims with veritable and accessible references, which I'm sure I can verify.

I shall revert the article after putting it to Wikipedia dispute resolution. Potohar1982 (talk) 15:57, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Possible copyright problem

This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 17:53, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Removal of photographs.

I am asking the recent editors to revert the article or provide a good basis as to why the article should not be. I shall also be seeking to have this article put to dispute resolution upon which I shall revert it myself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Potohar1982 (talk • contribs) 23:54, 27 January 2014 (UTC)