Talk:Public relations of high fructose corn syrup

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contradictory statements[edit]

Interesting that the article leads with "the lack of scientific evidence that HFCS differs nutritionally from sugar" but then further down states "known health risks include weight gain/obesity, type-2 diabetes, elevated LDL ("bad") cholesterol levels, long-term liver damage and mercury exposure." Phrasing in the opening paragraph could perhaps be a little more neutral? Obviously sugar is bad for you, but there is some evidence that HFCS is even worse. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.49.153.125 (talk) 07:33, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2011-2012[edit]

Haven't there been some newer commercials and such that are pro-syrup that could be elaborated on more? InfernalAngel00 (talk) 08:04, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Other countries?[edit]

I was just wondering if there've been similar things in countries other than America? HFCS is used worldwide, but the article only has examples from the USA. 109.246.242.180 (talk) 17:47, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

HFCS is used primarily in the US, because it is cheaper than sugar. In Europe it is vice versa, the local variants of US products are made with sugar. The Situation might change in 2016/17 when the so called "sugar quota" will be dropped. But there is a similar situation in regard to the public image of sugar. In germany manufacturers of organic food and drinks often use cane sugar instead of beet sugar, although it has to be imported. There is no physiological difference between them, but lots of customers consider cane sugar to be tastier or even healthier. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.115.51.60 (talk) 17:35, 3 January 2014 (UTC) [reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Public relations of high fructose corn syrup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:16, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]