Talk:Public health genomics

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Disability

Public health genomics is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

Medicine: Genetics Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Medical genetics task force.

Untitled[edit]

The automatic page watch recommended deletion of the original article as it appeared to be the introduction to a seminar. However, the original author (Pete.Schroeder@gmx.de) objects to this as "Public Health Genomics" is a scientific discipline and as such a subfield of health sciences. Hence, the automatically generated suggestion for deletion was based on a misunderstanding that I hereby wish to clarify. ps

This article is really bad[edit]

Sorry. It's true.

Really bad tone, not very well referenced, and incorrectly placed.

I've had similar problems with a number of wikipedia's other public health articles (c.f Influenza pandemic which is still very woeful)

This needs to be written in a less condescending, more informative tone. And appropriate in-text references from priamry and secondary sources (i.e. science papers and textbooks respectively).--ZayZayEM 05:55, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Public health genomics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.phgen.nrw.de/typo3/fileadmin/downloads/ManualVersand_Bellagio_Report-230106.pdf
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.genome.gov/12513983
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.redorbit.com/news/display/?id=294054
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/go/ourwork/pharmacogenetics/publication_314.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.graphint.org/docs/2006-08-burke.pdf
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.phgen.nrw.de/typo3/fileadmin/downloads/ManualVersand_Bellagio_Report-230106.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:37, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]