Talk:Pro-Ject

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

sales volume discussion[edit]

I'd like to follow up on that as I believe Pro-ject is the biggest player of "new" (as opposed to refurbished/secodn hand") TTs for the audiophile market (I.e. not the DJ market, for which Technics, Numark and Vestax woudl be much bigger). One (visibly not independent, but thorough) source [1] quotes Pro-ject as being the World's largest manufacturer of turntables...but I beleive this is true only of HiFi TT. Some more info can be found on the US importer's website [2] I have also asked them for their sales volume. An email from their international relations dpt quotes 3500 TTs per month...but that is not really acceptabel as a reliable source is it? I am still lookign for more data --MarmotteiNoZ 11:01, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Biased description?[edit]

This description looks like a PR statement to me. The following lines caught my attention:

"From the tiniest screw to the chassis, everything is done by technicians."
"A strict four step quality control ensures that everything works as intended."
"By shrinking the cabinets to a miniature size, they are able to save costs and offer a true price to performance relation."

The first two may be somewhat factual but really sound like advertising lines. As for the third one, it does not seem factual at all to me. Does anyone share my opinion or am I tagging too aggressively here?

--Nosufu (talk) 13:26, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with all three examples. It's terrible and needs a rewrite. 2.99.36.149 (talk) 05:51, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]