Talk:Postage stamp demonetization
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Merger Needed[edit]
The great bulk of both articles comprises the same text. NoelWalley 23:39, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- Freaky - history makes it seems as though I created both independently about six months apart, somehow using nearly the exact same words each time. Anyway, it's cleaned up now, I hope. Stan 07:45, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
slight inaccuracy[edit]
"any unused stamp is effectively equivalent to its face value" Afaict at least in the UK this is not strictly true, some stamps do have a monetary face value but others are labeled with a class of service (e.g. 1st, 2nd, 1st large etc). Afaict one can gain a (small) financial advantage by buying such stamps just before a postage price increase. 20:21, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Postage stamp demonetization. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20130809232454/http://www.postnl.com/press/664420/Gulden_postzegel_nog_tot_1_november_2013_geldig.aspx to http://www.postnl.com/press/664420/Gulden_postzegel_nog_tot_1_november_2013_geldig.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:36, 21 January 2018 (UTC)