This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Green Politics, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Green PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject Green PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Green PoliticsGreen Politics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
Do you think it's possible (no pun intended) the the name of the article could be changed back to Possibile? Im not really sure what the common rules are. Yabloko's name isnt translated, but it seems most others are. I think the general trend does seem to be to translate the names to English, so moving it to the current title was not by any means unusual. —Soap— 05:49, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Is there any official document stating Possible as official English name? If not, I think the original one should be retained, as this could qualify as Original Research--Dans (talk) 19:17, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The general trend is to translate names into English. "Possible" is the obvious translation of Possibile. --Checco (talk) 23:27, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I support using "Possible" as the article title - it's a straightforward translation into English, the only possible one actually, if you excuse the pun.--Autospark (talk) 10:52, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Possible (Italy) → Possible (political party) – In this case the correct disambiguation is "political party", not the nationality, because it must not be distinguished from parties of other countries with the same name, but by the very meaning of "Possible". Scia Della Cometa (talk) 19:08, 7 April 2022 (UTC) — Relisting.Turnagra (talk) 20:27, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes, the disambiguation of political party is much more important. >>> Extorc.talk(); 09:59, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Possibile. No indication it's commonly known by a translation in English-language sources. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:10, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
SupportSDC’s proposal to move the article to “Possible (political party)”.—Autospark (talk) 08:45, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
