Talk:Porcelain Black/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jennie--x (talk · contribs) 11:50, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Initial Comments[edit]

  • Lead
  • The claim that Black gained a "cult following" needs to be sourced as it could be challenged.
  • "Musically, she fuses industrial themes with pop music conventions such as electronic synths and a heavy reliance upon hooks. The combination polarizing opinions, she is best known for her guttural vocals and two-toned hair." This doesn't make sense fully - what combination is polarizing opinion? Pop/industrial music or guttural vocals/two-toned hair -- could this be arranged more clearly? Furthermore, are there sources that prove something is polarizing?
  •  Done I decided to remove both concerns, as they seem to violate WP:BLP. Originally, I believed the sources under "Public Image" supported the polarization of opinion, but that might be original research. "Cult following" was OR obtained from source 5 which mentions the Myspace fandom.--Thevampireashlee (talk) 02:04, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Life and career
  •  Done
  • Artistry
  • Minor grammar note: The sentence "Often, comparisons are drawn between her and Lady Gaga[23][24][25] But, she has also been compared to...", the "But" should be lower case and there should be a comma after Lady Gaga.
  • Personal life
  •  Done
  • Discography, filmography and tours
  •  Done
  • References
  •  Done

Overall Summary[edit]

GA review
Final Summary
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (Is there clear sentences, spelling and grammar?): checkY
    b (Does it comply with MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists?): checkY
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (Is there a references section?): checkY
    b (Are there citations for quotes/statistics/challenging info?): checkY
    c (Does it contain no original research?): checkY
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (Does it cover the major aspects of the topic?): checkY
    b (Does it use summary style?): checkY
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    (Are points made with due weight?): checkY
  5. It is stable.
    (Are there no edit wars, etc?): checkY
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (Do the images have appropriate fair-use rationales?): checkY
    b (Do the images have suitable captions?): checkY

Overall:
Pass/Fail: Pass - A well-written article that makes the use of excellent reliable sources, congratulations to the editors and nominator Thevampireashlee.

· · ·