Talk:Polish units of measurement

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Measurement, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.MeasurementWikipedia:WikiProject MeasurementTemplate:WikiProject MeasurementMeasurement articles

Poland High‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Modern values?[edit]

It would be nice to have the modern equivilents for these. The article on the Obsolete Russian System of Measurment has them, and would be a good template for this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.59.195.61 (talk) 15:03, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Move[edit]

I intend to change the title from Ancient to Old – Absolwent 23:06, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, that makes sense to me.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk} 23:26, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could you now wait, let's say, for a week (a day?) and remove the three ancient entries that point to this page?

Thank you – Absolwent 04:11, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Since nothing links to them anyway, I will go ahead and delete them now (in the future, you may want to note such requests on WP:RFD).--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk} 02:02, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Values[edit]

See here for a cwiertnia of 360.3 L for the Krakow rye trade.
See here for Cardarelli not using it at all, calling it a cwierc instead. (If that's the singular form and the other some bizarre plural form... use the singular form, give it an English plural, and link to its wiktionary entry.)
See here and here and here for a korzec of 128 L.
See here for a Warsaw korzec of 120.6 L (what we have), but a Cracow korzec of 43.7 L. — $Llywelyn II$ 00:08, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]