This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Nice piece, but on first reaction I'm not sure you're not overdoing the underground paganism thing. Few diptychs have overtly Christian elements in fact, and small private late antique ivory & silverware often, even usually, continues pagan decorative traditions - what that meant for the views of the owners is now impossible to guess. Even the Sarcophagus of Junius Bassus has overtly pagan elements, and by 500 Christianity was already probably so well established that no tension was felt in continuing old traditions. Pride in Roman tradition is another constant element in elite iconography. I'll see what I have. Johnbod (talk) 13:49, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This is interesting on the continuation of pagan imagery. Johnbod (talk) 16:28, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
