Talk:Pi is 3

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Hello! I want to inform you that I have checked your article and mark it as reviewed. Have a good day and thanks for creating the article!

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 09:25, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

References

Hi @Freetrashbox, when you get a chance could you double-check that these two edits have together had the correct effect? I was fixing a reference error and as a result created a duplicate reference. I don't understand Japanese so I can't tell whether they are the same source or not. A second issue is that there are shortened footnote references to "朝日新聞 2012", which isn't in the reference list. If you haven't already you may wish to install User:Trappist the monk/HarvErrors.js, which provides very helpful highlighting of errors with shortened-footnote references. Thank-you for the article! Wham2001 (talk) 10:41, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you. I fixed them. Please check it. Freetrashbox (talk) 11:13, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Looks good to me – thank-you! Wham2001 (talk) 11:18, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Alternate titles

Maybe the article should be titled something like 'Japanese pi approximation guideline' or smth? Remsense (talk) 11:32, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

other uses of pi =3

the article might mention the jokw that engeneirs use3 as pi 108.29.69.127 (talk) 02:54, 11 April 2024 (UTC)