Talk:Philip-Lorca diCorcia

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Photography: History High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject History of photography.

The article seems to take a disparaging tone towards the photographer and the particular litigation.

Add External Link[edit]

I would like to submit Trunk Archive as an external link. Trunk Archive is an image licensing agency that represents his photography archives. There are links to many online galleries which shows a limited selection of his portfolio. I believe it is valuable and necessary to add Trunk Archive who handles his photos in syndication, and also serves as a more comprehensive gallery to his body of work.

There is a log-in for users that set up an account, but also a general view to the public that requires no log-in at all. This is accessible through the "view archive" link. Thank you.Photoagent (talk) 21:31, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup[edit]

I made a cleanup sweep through the article; most was non-controversial manual of style stuff. However, I particularly want to note that I also removed "and is considered one of the most influential photographers of his generation." This was sourced to a gallery web-site which sells his works; they of course are a non-neutral source of opinion and this is therefore a violation of the Reliable Source policy. I left some asserted facts sourced to the gallery, while not strictly "reliable", they're less questionable. I also removed the agent representation; that's a commercial promotional statement, IMHO. Studerby (talk) 18:29, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Philip-Lorca diCorcia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.photoeye.com/bookstore/citation.cfm?catalog=TD034&i=&i2=

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:59, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]