This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
All references to the current political situation or previous ones involving Peter Sloly are being removed, including those that are entirely neutral. Given the warning about the article being edited by someone with a close connection to Peter Sloly, I am naturally concerned about the objectivity of these edits. 207.228.88.114 (talk) 15:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
WP:RS, WP:V and WP:BLP apply. Where are the reliable sources, where is the relevant neutral content? GiantSnowman 16:10, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You're gonna call putting a hat on a statue 'desecration' of monuments? There was no destruction. What complete BullShit! You need to lock this page because that's the only way you can spread your lies and disinformation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:603:4880:E440:397C:59EC:2F2C:6F6 (talk) 05:30, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The two articles referenced are long ago obsolete and this has been debunked by many media. But we know that truth and NPOV are hard to come by these days in Wikipedia. I'd edit it, but I know it would get reverted each time by the overlords. Canadian media is government subsidised. To consider most Canadian media "neutral sources" is really to not understand the bigger media context in the country. That sentence should be removed. Stick to the facts relevant to Mr Sloly.--Tallard (talk) 04:54, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Feel free to suggest alternative sources/wording here. GiantSnowman 08:26, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
