Talk:Peter Meijer/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Trump vote in the lede
How he voted on a single issue is surely not defining enough to go in the lede of a bio. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pipsally (talk • contribs) 03:25, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Connections to "Meijer Family" blackmail plot
The article concerning his immediate family needs filling out. I, in my rather clumsy manner did try to impart the rather serious manner of the incident. The reaction was somewhat strange given that it is all open source UK information. If the problem is data protection "European Union"--because the USA does not--legally hold the UK law as sound, outside the "EU", then I understand the reluctance in including the families UK details. However, given the current state of affairs in the UK; & Peter Meijer's past, being a war hero-then I do feel including the relevant information is helpful. In particular considering the risks the individual takes in public life, with very little protection. From the UK understanding of the situation-plus the family commercial interests being heavily involved in the "Covid 19" vaccine program-I find the Wikipedia community, deliberately keeping low key on this matter, strange in the extreme; considering he will have security clearance of a high level, no doubt preying heavily on his military experience. The individual blackmailer, James Casbolt, a-k-a Michael Prince, is not a man to be taking lightly, especially giving, he is in care of the UK security services-which means to anyone that knows of him-he is the one that is in control of the relationship. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.17.104.156 (talk) 18:48, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
If it is a simple matter of law, I understand the reluctance; however, I hope the man has a serious amount of security vetting around him.82.17.104.156 (talk) 18:52, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
- Casbolt and Haley Meijer are irrelevant and no significant coverage has been extended to Peter Meijer (the subject of this article) about Casbolt or his fantasies. He was jailed in 2015 for 12 years, and as far as any coverage is concerned he is still behind bars - rather than in the care of any "security services". Koncorde (talk) 21:05, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
- Forgot to thank you for your expert knowledge on the subject of "CASBOLT". The only problems I had with the articles, were that they did not bare witness to the seriousness of the case outside of his "So called" fantasies. I will simply remind you that the mental health report clearly stated that he was simply being manipulative. He was and is a obvious risk to women and a dangerous sexual predator. I was simply making the point that last known, he was released in 2019 and in the care of, or working with UK military authorities in the North of the country.82.17.104.156 (talk) 11:45, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- "Last known" by any coverage I can find, he is still behind bars. If there is coverage supporting any claim he is behind in the care of the military I haven't seen it. It still has nothing to do with Peter Meijer or this article and seems like self promotion/insertion by Casbolt himself. Koncorde (talk) 18:18, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Forgot to thank you for your expert knowledge on the subject of "CASBOLT". The only problems I had with the articles, were that they did not bare witness to the seriousness of the case outside of his "So called" fantasies. I will simply remind you that the mental health report clearly stated that he was simply being manipulative. He was and is a obvious risk to women and a dangerous sexual predator. I was simply making the point that last known, he was released in 2019 and in the care of, or working with UK military authorities in the North of the country.82.17.104.156 (talk) 11:45, 13 March 2021 (UTC)